Carlos Marsh v. Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC et al
Plaintiff: Carlos Marsh
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv06877
Filed: July 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2020 Filing 17 STATEMENT re: Order on Application to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-22), #15 . (Montgomery, Elliott)
September 25, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Elliott Montgomery on behalf of Plaintiff Carlos Marsh. Filed by Plaintiff Carlos Marsh (Attorney Elliott Charles Montgomery added to party Carlos Marsh(pty:pla))(Montgomery, Elliott)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: granting #14 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. This case is referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 2. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: 7 days prior to expiration of 90 day stay. See order for further details. (lom)
September 2, 2020 Filing 14 REQUEST to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Zreik, Sammy)
September 2, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC, (Attorney Sammy Zreik added to party Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC(pty:dft))(Zreik, Sammy)
August 21, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carlos Marsh, upon Defendant Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC served on 8/20/2020, answer due 9/10/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe -working at check cashing store in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
August 11, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Constitutional Question filed by Plaintiff Carlos Marsh. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell)
August 11, 2020 Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Carlos Marshto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Order to Show Cause,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Proof of Service)(Handy, Russell)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplementaljurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and all other state law claims asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than August 12, 2020. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of those claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (shb)
August 4, 2020 Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation (early mediation and stay program). (jre)
July 31, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC. (esa)
July 31, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
July 31, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (esa)
July 31, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Carlos Marsh. (Handy, Russell)
July 31, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carlos Marsh, (Handy, Russell)
July 31, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carlos Marsh. (Handy, Russell)
July 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27440506 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Carlos Marsh. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Carlos Marsh(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlos Marsh v. Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ahmad Cahla Plaza LLC
Represented By: Sammy Zreik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Marsh
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Elliott Charles Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?