Brendem Plong et al v. BM Realestate Services Inc. et al
| Brendem Plong and Mareine M. Plong |
| Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., BM Realestate Services Inc., MERS, Goldman Sachs and Co., MTGLQ Investors, LP, Chicaco Title Company, Does 1 through 10 Inclusive, Rushmore Loan Management Service LLC and Clear Recon Corp |
| 2:2020cv06999 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| John W Holcomb |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 48
This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John W. Holcomb, United States District Judge. Judge Holcomb is located in Courtroom 2, on the 2nd Floor of the George E. Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501. Additional information regarding Judge Holcomb's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 47
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Goldman Sachs and Co., identifying The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. (Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 46
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. identifying The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 45
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. #44 filed by Defendant Goldman Sachs and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-20)(Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 44
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. filed by defendant Goldman Sachs and Co.. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 43
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-102) approved by Chief Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF THE CALENDAR of Judge John W. Holcomb, this case is transferred from Judge Philip S. Gutierrez to the calendar of Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-06999 JWH(AGRx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 42
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Mary H Haas on behalf of Defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. (Attorney Mary H Haas added to party Goldman Sachs and Co.(pty:dft))(Haas, Mary)
|
|
Filing 41
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Frederick A Haist on behalf of Defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. (Attorney Frederick A Haist added to party Goldman Sachs and Co.(pty:dft))(Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 40
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mary H Haas counsel for Defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP. Adding Mary H. Haas as counsel of record for MTGLQ Investors, L.P. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant MTGLQ Investors, L.P.. (Attorney Mary H Haas added to party MTGLQ Investors, LP(pty:dft))(Haas, Mary)
|
|
Filing 23
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Based on the Court's directive, DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS #15 and PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE #21 are continued to 11/09/2020 at 1:30 p.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 22
DECLARATION Of Brandem Plong and Mareine M. Plong, in Support Of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant #21 filed by Plaintiff Brendem Plong. (bm)
|
|
Filing 21
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION To Set Aside Void Judgment And Quash Writ Of Possession, Points And Authorities, Declaration, [Proposed] Order filed by plaintiff Brendem Plong. Motion set for hearing on 10/19/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts and Supporting Evidence on Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion, #3 Proposed Order to Set Aside, #4 Proposed Order for Order to Set Aside Void Order and Judgment and Quash Writ of Possession) (bm)
|
|
Filing 20
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP, identifying MLQ, L.L.C.; The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.; Goldman Sachs Global Holdings L.L.C.; Goldman Sachs Holding Company, LLC. (Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 19
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP identifying The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 18
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP #17 filed by Defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-20)(Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP filed by defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Frederick A Haist added to party MTGLQ Investors, LP(pty:dft)) (Haist, Frederick)
|
|
Filing 16
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Chicaco Title Company, identifying Fidelity National Title Group, parent; Fidelity National Financial, parent. (Broersma, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chicaco Title Company and Proof of Service filed by Defendant Chicaco Title Company. Motion set for hearing on 11/2/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Kevin R Broersma added to party Chicaco Title Company(pty:dft)) (Broersma, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 39
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Clear Recon Corp. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon signature not legible in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 38
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. served on 8/8/2020, answer due 8/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon signature not legible in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 37
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon (signature not legible) in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 36
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant MTGLQ Investors, L.P. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon (signature not legible) in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm) Modified on 9/17/2020 (bm).
|
|
Filing 35
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 34
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. served on 8/10/2020, answer due 8/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 33
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. served on 8/15/2020, answer due 9/8/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail.Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 32
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. "MERS". Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 31
PROOF OF SERVICE ON AN INDIVIDUAL WITHIN THE UNITED STATES Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant BM Realestate Services Inc. served on 8/8/2010, answer due 8/29/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 30
PROOF OF SERVICE ON AN INDIVIDUAL WITHIN THE UNITED STATES Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP served on 8/8/2020, answer due 8/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 29
PROOF OF SERVICE ON A CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, OR ASSOCIATION Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. served on 8/13/2020, answer due 9/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm) Modified on 9/16/2020 (bm).
|
|
Filing 28
PROOF OF SERVICE ON A CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, OR ASSOCIATION Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. served on 8/7/2020, answer due 8/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm) Modified on 9/16/2020 (bm).
|
|
Filing 27
PROOF OF SERVICE ON AN INDIVIDUAL WITHIN THE UNITED STATES Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Clear Recon Corp served on 8/7/2020, answer due 8/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 26
PROOF OF SERVICE ON A CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, OR ASSOCIATION Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems served on 8/8/2020, answer due 8/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 25
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Chicago Title Company (Originate Truestee). Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm)
|
|
Filing 24
PROOF OF SERVICE ON AN INDIVIDUAL WITHIN THE UNITED STATES Executed by Plaintiff Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong, upon Defendant Chicago Title Company served on 8/10/2020, answer due 8/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon not indicated in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service by mail. Original Summons NOT returned. (bm) Modified on 9/16/2020 (bm).
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTES (In Chambers): The Court DENIES the ex parte application for a temporary restraining order by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez denying #3 EX PARTE APPLICATION: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car)
|
|
Filing 10
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems. (car)
|
|
Filing 9
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Clear Recon Corp. (car)
|
|
Filing 8
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. (car)
|
|
Filing 7
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Goldman Sachs and Co. (car)
|
|
Filing 6
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant MTGLQ Investors, LP. (car)
|
|
Filing 5
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Chicaco Title Company. (car)
|
|
Filing 4
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant BM Realestate Services Inc. (car)
|
|
Filing 3
RESTRAINING ORDER INJUNCTION AND MOTION TO CHALLENGE JURISDICTION IS PENDING, AND REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY HEARING ON THE MATTER filed by Plaintiffs Brendem Plong, Mareine M. Plong. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (car)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Brendem Plong, Mareine M. Plong (car)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Defendants. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg.(Filing fee $ 400 FEE PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Mareine M. Plong, Brendem Plong. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Complaint, #2 Part 3 of Complaint, #3 Part 4 of Complaint, #4 Part 5 of Complaint, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Lodged Lis Pendens) (car)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
