Anton Karraa et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Rabadi Service Station, Inc., Anton Karraa, Virtual Media Group, Inc., J. Keith Stephens and CALPRO |
| City of Los Angeles, Outfront Media LLC, Outfront Media, Inc. and Doe |
| 2:2020cv07036 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 OPPOSITION PRELIMINARY INJUCTION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Removing or Damaging Billboard #23 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Removing or Damaging Billboard #24 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Removing or Damaging Billboard #22 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Frank Lara iso City's Oppos)(Fong, Kenneth) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Removing or Damaging Billboard filed by Plaintiffs CALPRO. Motion set for hearing on 10/26/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Haynes, Raymond) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Removing or Damaging Billboard filed by Plaintiffs CALPRO. Motion set for hearing on 10/26/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Haynes, Raymond) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re Removing or Damaging Billboard filed by Plaintiffs CALPRO. Motion set for hearing on 10/26/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Haynes, Raymond) |
Filing 21
SCHEDULING NOTICE/IN CHAMBERS ORDER-TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: NEW CASE STATUS CONFERENCE; #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant; and #12 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant - The initial status conference and motion hearing previously scheduled for 09/21/2020 at 1:30 p.m. are vacated and off-calendar. The motions are submitted. Order to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 19 REPLY Reply NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendant Outfront Media LLC. (Davis, Allison) |
| Filing 18 REPLY In Support of for Judgment on the Pleadings #12 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Fong, Kenneth) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to for Judgment on the Pleadings #12 filed by Plaintiff CALPRO. (Haynes, Raymond) |
| Filing 16 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Plaintiff CALPRO. (Haynes, Raymond) |
| Filing 15 Doe Amendment AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Plaintiffs amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiffs CALPRO(Haynes, Raymond) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel filed by Plaintiffs CALPRO, Anton Karraa, Rabadi Service Station, Inc., J. Keith Stephens, Virtual Media Group, Inc. (Haynes, Raymond) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Fong, Kenneth) |
| Filing 12 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #9 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fong, Kenneth) Modified on 8/25/2020 (pc). |
| Filing 11 SCHEDULING NOTICE - The Initial Status Conference scheduled for 10/19/2020 at 3:00 p.m. has been rescheduled to 9/21/2020 at 1:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Outfront Media LLC, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #7 served on August 17, 2020. (Davis, Allison) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Outfront Media LLC, Outfront Media, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/21/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit A to RJN, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Allison A Davis added to party Outfront Media, Inc. (pty:dft)) (Davis, Allison) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 10/19/2020 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 7
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 4 JOINDER filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles joining in Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . (Fong, Kenneth) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, Doe 1 through Doe 25, Outfront Media, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Virtual Media Group, Inc., Rabadi Service Station, Inc., CALPRO, Anton Karraa, J. Keith Stephens. Filed in State Court on 4/27/2020 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT against Defendant Outfront Media LLC by Plaintiffs. Upon the filing of the complaint, the plaintiff, being ignorant of the true name of the defendant and having designated the defendant in the complaint by the fictitious name of Doe 1 and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be Outfront Media LLC amends the Complaint - (Discovery) Submitted with Attachment 6 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs, upon Defendant Outfront Media LLC acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 7/7/2020, answer due 7/28/2020. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Anthony M Leones, Counsel for Defendant. Submitted with Attachment 8 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. Filed in State Court on 6/11/2020 Submitted with Attachment 10 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Outfront Media LLC, identifying Outfront Media, Inc.. (Haas, Mary) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Outfront Media LLC. (Haas, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior, case number 20STCV15924 Receipt No: ACACDC-27506129 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Outfront Media LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit Ex 3 - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit Ex 4 - Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum, #5 Exhibit Ex 5 - Notice of Assignment, #6 Exhibit Ex 6 - Amendment to Complaint, #7 Exhibit Ex 7 - Notice of Acknowledgment, #8 Exhibit Ex 8 - Executed Notice of Acknowledgment, #9 Exhibit Ex 9 - Notice of Case Management Conference, #10 Exhibit Ex 10 - Answer - City of Los Angeles) (Attorney Mary H Haas added to party Outfront Media LLC(pty:dft))(Haas, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
