Yury Kapgan v. Crestbrook Insurance Company et al
Yury Kapgan |
Crestbrook Insurance Company and Does 1-50, inclusive |
2:2020cv07295 |
August 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) report and sets the pretrial and trial dates noted in the table below. A more complete description of these deadlines is contained in the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and incorporated herein. In addition to the dates below, the parties are to file a joint statement advising the court of the outcome of the settlement conference within seven days of the conference. Jury Trial set for 10/18/2021 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/17/2021 11:00 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties (Hearing Deadline) 3/9/2021. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 3/26/2021. Motion Hearing Deadline 7/9/2021. Settlement Conference Deadline 7/27/2021. Trial Filings (First Set) Deadline 8/31/2021. Trial Filings (Second Set) Deadline 9/7/2021. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (gk) |
Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company.. (Hines, Marc) |
Filing 17 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-098) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the creation of the calendar of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following cases are hereby transferred from the calendar of Judge Dale S. Fischer to the calendar of Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.:. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-07295 SB (AGRx). (esa) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: granting #15 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. See order for specifics. (lom) Modified on 8/27/2020 (lom). |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company, served on Plaintiff the Standing Order for Cases Assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and Order Setting Scheduling Order. (Hines, Marc) |
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/5/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 11 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company, (Hines, Marc) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other) #4 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Document was e-filed under the incorrect event of Notice (Other). The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Notices and by selecting Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. Please e-file the document under the correct event. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): The pro se litigant's email address was added to CM/ECF in error upon the opening of this Notice of Removal case. The pro se litigant's email will be removed from CM/ECF and will not be used for electronic service without the appropriate registration and consent. See Local Rule 53. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company. Submitted with Exhibit B at Pg. 121 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Crestbrook Insurance Company, Does 1-50, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Yury Kapgan. Filed in State Court on 7/1/2020 Submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company, served on Adverse Party and Court of Removal to Federal Court. (Hines, Marc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company. (Hines, Marc) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE of Corporate Corporate Disclosure filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company (Hines, Marc) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company. (Hines, Marc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20SMCV00885 Receipt No: ACACDC-27616553 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Crestbrook Insurance Company. (Attorney Marc S Hines added to party Crestbrook Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Hines, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.