Edward Buck v. Michael Carvajal, et al
| Edward Buck |
| Wilson, Carlos Peterson, H. Tellez, Michael Carvajal and B. Hand |
| 2:2020cv07475 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned addressed to Edward Buck re Order #4 (hr) |
Filing 4
ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Plaintiff shall file proofs of service showing compliance with this paragraph within 90 days after the filing of the complaint, i.e., no later than November 16, 2020. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 2 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 as to Defendants Michael Carvajal, B. Hand, Carlos Peterson, H. Tellez, Wilson. (car) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Michael Carvajal, B. Hand, Carlos Peterson, H. Tellez, Wilson pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (Filing fee $400 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Edward Buck. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
