Roy Davis Gash v. 15147 Woodruff Place, LLC et al
Roy Davis Gash |
15147 WOODRUFF PLACE, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2020cv07826 |
August 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Consuelo B Marshall |
Karen L Stevenson |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys) |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant 15147 Woodruff Place, LLC. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash, identifying 15147 WOODRUFF PLACE, LLC. (Wakefield, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Wakefield, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27815116 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Roy Davis Gash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Civil Complaint) (Attorney David C Wakefield added to party Roy Davis Gash(pty:pla))(Wakefield, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.