Cedric Johnson v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
Cedric Johnson |
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
2:2020cv08199 |
September 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. New Case Number 5:20-cv-1865-KK. (lh) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Julie Black re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #3 filed by Movant AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Confirmation of Payment for Notice of Removal)(Sung, William) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC2002398 with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 09/08/2020, receipt number 27982903), filed by Defendant AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Sung, William) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant AMF Bowling Centers, Inc., identifying Cedric Johnson, AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.. (Attorney William C Sung added to party AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. (pty:bkmov))(Sung, William) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.. (Sung, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.