Mengchu Wang v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al
MENGCHU WANG |
Tracy Renaud and U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
2:2020cv08243 |
September 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Mandamus & Other |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mengchu Wang, upon Plaintiff All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Clerks Office. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipt, #2 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipt)(Lu, Robert) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mengchu Wang, upon Defendant Tracy Renaud served on 9/16/2020, answer due 11/16/2020; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 9/16/2020, answer due 11/16/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to USCIS, Office of the Chief Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Declaration re: Proof of Service)(Lu, Robert) |
Filing 8 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mengchu Wang. (Lu, Robert) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court&s website under Judge Fischer&s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge&s Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
Filing 5 60 DAY Summons issued re Petition #1 as to defendants Tracy Renaud, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (esa) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF MENGCHU WANG, (Lu, Robert) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by PLAINTIFF MENGCHU WANG. (Lu, Robert) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Receipt No: ACACDC-28002045 - Fee: $400, filed by PLAINTIFF MENGCHU WANG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Affidavit OF MENGCHU WANG) (Attorney Robert K Lu added to party MENGCHU WANG(pty:pla))(Lu, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.