Orlando Garcia v. Kayoung Two, LLC et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| Kayoung Two, LLC and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2020cv08418 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Kayoung Two, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Won, David) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kayoung Two, LLC answer now due 11/13/2020, filed by Defendant Kayoung Two, LLC.(Attorney David D Won added to party Kayoung Two, LLC(pty:dft))(Won, David) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has reviewed the Response filed by plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). (See document for full details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garciato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Proof Of Service)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Kayoung Two, LLC served on 9/25/2020, answer due 10/16/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Ka Deung Kim in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c). (lc)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tj) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kayoung Two, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-28080359 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
