Daniel Smith v. City of Hope
Plaintiff: Daniel Smith
Defendant: CITY OF HOPE, a California Corporation and City of Hope
Case Number: 2:2020cv08426
Filed: September 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE 203 CLAIM AND TO STAY REMAINING PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION. PARTIES FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT EVERY 90 DAYS COMMENCING JANUARY 19, 2021 #8 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
October 20, 2020 Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Daniel Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lawler, Brian)
October 15, 2020 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Daniel Smith. upon City of Hope waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/15/2020, answer due 11/16/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Ankush Dhupar. (Lawler, Brian)
September 17, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Smith, (Lawler, Brian)
September 17, 2020 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Smith. (Lawler, Brian)
September 16, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately and in the correct event. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. Attachment 2 Notice of Interested Parties should be e-filed under Civil Events Other Filings Notices. (car)
September 16, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car)
September 15, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service, #4 Waiver of Service) (Attorney Brian Joseph Lawler added to party Daniel Smith(pty:pla))(Lawler, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel Smith v. City of Hope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF HOPE, a California Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Hope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Smith
Represented By: Brian Joseph Lawler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?