Tin Tri Nguyen v. David A. Marin et al
Tin Tri Nguyen |
William Barr, David A. Marin, Chad Wolf, Tony H. Pham and James Janecka |
2:2020cv08436 |
September 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Jacqueline Chooljian. New Case Number 5:20-cv-01920-TJH-JC. (car) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 filed by Petitioner Tin Tri Nguyen. (Seelig, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Tin Tri Nguyen. (Seelig, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-28089556 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Tin Tri Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Benjamin C. Seelig, #2 Exhibit 1-12 to Benjamin C. Seelig's Declaration, #3 Declaration of Tin Tri Nguyen, #4 Declaration of Laurel Loomis Rimon) (Attorney Benjamin Charles Seelig added to party Tin Tri Nguyen(pty:pet))(Seelig, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.