James Christopher Ball v. John F. Bennett et al
| James Christopher Ball |
| John F. Bennett, Nicola T. Hanna and Peter Anderson |
| 2:2020cv08745 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents), #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and complaint executed as to USA (60 days). Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner James Christopher Ball, re Summons Issued #4 , Summons Issued #9 , Summons Issued #8 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Petition (case opening), #1 , Summons Issued #10 served on 10/22/20. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit POS by Cert Mail Anderson, #2 Affidavit POS by Cert Mail Bennett, #3 Affidavit POS by Cert Mail Hanna, #4 Affidavit POS by Cert Mail Barr)(Ball, James) |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (case opening), #1 as to defendant Nicola T. Hanna. (lc) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (case opening), #1 as to defendant Peter Anderson. (lc) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (case opening), #1 as to defendant John F. Bennett. (lc) |
| Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS #3 Plaintiff's APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing in this case. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (lc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
| Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (case opening), #1 as to Respondents Peter Anderson, John F. Bennett, Nicola T. Hanna. (car) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Petitioner James Christopher Ball. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner James Christopher Ball (car) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS [18 USC 3057(a)(b); 18 USC 3771(a)(7); and 28 USC 58(a)(3)(F) and (f)(2)(B)] filed against Peter Anderson, John F. Bennett, Nicola T. Hanna (Filing fee $ 400 PAID), filed by Plaintiff James Christopher Ball. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
