Michael Dickerson v. Stuart Sherman
Michael Dickerson |
Stuart Sherman |
2:2020cv09570 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Gail J Standish |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kristen Joy Inberg counsel for Respondent Stuart Sherman. Adding Kristen J. Inberg as counsel of record for Stuart Sherman for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Stuart Sherman. (Attorney Kristen Joy Inberg added to party Stuart Sherman(pty:res))(Inberg, Kristen) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. that Respondent Stuart Sherman file Answer to the Petition not later than 12/28/2020. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 12/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Memo of Points and Authorities, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2) (efc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 4 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Receipt No. BCACDC-28602441 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Michael Dickerson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Exhibit Court of Appeal Opinion, #3 Exhibit CSC Denial, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Susan Lynn Ferguson added to party Michael Dickerson(pty:pet))(Ferguson, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Michael Dickerson v. Stuart Sherman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Stuart Sherman | |
Represented By: | Kristen Joy Inberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Dickerson | |
Represented By: | Susan Lynn Ferguson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.