Nathaniel Gulley v. The Hertz Corporation
| Nathaniel Gulley |
| The Hertz Corporation and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv00732 |
| January 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 6/6/22. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 13
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/1/2022 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 8/30/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial Plaintiff estimates 5-7 days; Defendant estimates 3-4 days, filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation.. (Rutschman, Aaron) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation, Certification of Service and Filing of Notice to Plaintiff and Clerk of the Superior Court of Removal of Civil Action to United States District Court (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service to Certification of Service and Filing of Notice to Plaintiff)(Bromley, Richard) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF INITIAL STANDING ORDER filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation. (Rutschman, Aaron) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation in Los Angeles Superior Court on 1/26/2021, attached as Exhibit 4.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Nathaniel Gulley in Los Angelse Superior Court on 12/28/2020, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation identifying Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service to Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Bromley, Richard) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation, identifying Nathaniel Gulley, The Hertz Corporation, Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service to Notice of Interested Parties)(Bromley, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service to USDC Civil Cover Sheet)(Bromley, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV49477 Receipt No: ACACDC-30265146 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service to Notice of Removal, #2 Complaint, #3 Service of Process for The Hertz Corporation, #4 Answer) (Attorney Richard E Bromley added to party The Hertz Corporation(pty:dft))(Bromley, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
