Eugene Hamilton v. Single Room Occupancy House Corporation et al
| Eugene Hamilton |
| Single Room Occupancy Housing Corporation and Steven Mathis |
| 2:2021cv01332 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #4 by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED (see comments above). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lom)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Eugene Hamilton. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Eugene Hamilton served on 2/8/2021. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing and Oral Argument filed by Plaintiff Eugene Hamilton. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Eugene Hamilton against Defendants Steven Mathis and Single Room Occupancy Housing Corporation. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
