Dennis Anthony Crump v. K. Clark
K. Clark |
Dennis Anthony Crump |
2:2021cv01431 |
February 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
John F Walter |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Dennis Anthony Crump. (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is GRANTED and Respondent is granted to and including April 24, 2021, within which to file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and to and including May 9, 2021, within which to file an Answer in the alternative. #6 (es) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by respondent K. Clark. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aarons, Kim) |
Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Dennis Crump. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA219464. (jo) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kim Aarons on behalf of Defendant K. Clark (Attorney Kim Aarons added to party K. Clark(pty:dft))(Aarons, Kim) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Respondent shall file and serve an Answer and Return to Petition no later than April 9, 2021. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 3/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attach.Petition, #2 Attach.CV-011B) (es) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111/CV69) (jtil) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Plaintiff Dennis Anthony Crump. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dennis Anthony Crump v. K. Clark | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dennis Anthony Crump | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: K. Clark | |
Represented By: | Kim Aarons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.