James Shayler v. Miso Tofu et al
JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, and James Shayler |
MISO TOFU, a business of unknown form, HYUN BUM CHOI, an individual, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, MIN SEOK SEO, an individual, Miso Tofu, Hyun Bum Choi, Does 1-10, inclusive and Min Seok Seo |
2:2021cv01579 |
February 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A Oliver |
Mark C Scarsi |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (JS-6) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. re: Notice of Settlement #18 . (smo) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff James Shayler. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Shaylerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #14 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JRM, #2 Declaration of Shayler)(Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 15 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/8/2021. (smo) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Min Seok Seo. (lh) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hyun Bum Choi. (lh) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Miso Tofu. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30618773 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff JAMES SHAYLER, an individual,. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party JAMES SHAYLER, an individual, (pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.