Engage BDR, LLC v. GoDaddy Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Engage BDR, LLC
Defendant: DOES 1 - 10, inclusive, GoDaddy Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv02014
Filed: March 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2021 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Engage BDR, LLC, upon Defendant GoDaddy Inc. served on 3/18/2021, answer due 4/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Secretary in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Scroggins, Thad)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 05/24/2021 at 10:30am am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 5/17/2021. (kdu)
March 9, 2021 Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
March 8, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant GoDaddy Inc. (ghap)
March 8, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
March 8, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap)
March 4, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Engage BDR, LLC. (Scroggins, Thad)
March 4, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Engage BDR, LLC. (Scroggins, Thad)
March 4, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Engage BDR, LLC, (Scroggins, Thad)
March 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30858690 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Engage BDR, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Thad Marvin Scroggins added to party Engage BDR, LLC(pty:pla))(Scroggins, Thad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Engage BDR, LLC v. GoDaddy Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Engage BDR, LLC
Represented By: Thad Marvin Scroggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 - 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GoDaddy Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?