Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. E-Sceptre, Inc.
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
| E-Sceptre, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv02470 |
| March 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Alka Sagar |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant E-Sceptre, Inc. (gk) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Glenn, Michael) |
| Filing 9 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Glenn, Michael) |
| Filing 8 certification and notice of interested parties filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Local Rule 7.1-1 (Glenn, Michael) |
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Glenn, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30955188 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Patent, #2 Exhibit Claim) (Attorney Michael J. Glenn added to party Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.(pty:pla))(Glenn, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. E-Sceptre, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Glenn |
| Represented By: | Isaac P. Rabicoff |
| Represented By: | Isaac Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: E-Sceptre, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
