Orlando Garcia v. Maruti Investments, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Orlando Garcia
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Maruti Investments, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv02607
Filed: March 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
March 25, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
March 25, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (esa)
March 25, 2021 Filing 4 Defendant's Certification And NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Maruti Investments, Inc., identifying Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC. (Arnett, Ashley)
March 25, 2021 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Ashley N. Arnett re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Maruti Investments, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Complaint to Declaration of Ashley N. Arnett)(Arnett, Ashley)
March 25, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Maruti Investments, Inc.. (Arnett, Ashley)
March 25, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV06833 Receipt No: ACACDC-30985459 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Maruti Investments, Inc.. (Attorney Ashley Nicole Arnett added to party Maruti Investments, Inc.(pty:dft))(Arnett, Ashley)
March 25, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Maruti Investments, Inc., filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (filed in state court 2/22/21, submitted as document 3, attachment 1) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orlando Garcia v. Maruti Investments, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maruti Investments, Inc.
Represented By: Ashley Nicole Arnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Orlando Garcia
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Zachary Manning Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?