Ricka Thomas v. Intercontinental Hotels Group, PLC et al
Ricka Thomas |
Does 1-25, inclusive, Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, LLC and Intercontinental Hotels Group, PLC (IHG) doing business as Holiday Inn Resort Aruba |
2:2021cv04117 |
May 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
John E McDermott |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ricka Thomas, identifying INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP, PLC. (Stone-Molloy, Michael) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, LLC, Intercontinental Hotels Group, PLC. (jp) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties - under Category - "NOTICES". In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ricka Thomas. (Stone-Molloy, Michael) |
Filing 7 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 05/17/2021, receipt number 31310201), filed by Plaintiff Ricka Thomas.(Stone-Molloy, Michael) |
Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ricka Thomas. (Stone-Molloy, Michael) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dd) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31310201 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Thomas Ricka. (Attorney Michael Alves Stone-Molloy added to party Thomas Ricka(pty:pla))(Stone-Molloy, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.