Brayan Martin Meza v. Marcus Pollard
| Brayan Martin Meza |
| Marcus Pollard |
| 2:2021cv04189 |
| May 18, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Karen E Scott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT. 7) by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Petitioner's Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 10 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 21-55601 assigned to Petition for Certificate of Appealability #8 as to petitioner Brayan Martin Meza. (lom) |
| Filing 9 Application For Certificate of Appealability From District Court, by petitioner Brayan Martin Meza. (Attachments: #1 Part 2) (mat) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability to USDC by petitioner Brayan Martin Meza; Filed as Notice of Appeal to 9th CCA from District Court Judgment #5 filed 5/25/21. Certificate of Appealability has been ruled on 5/25/21, see item #6 . (mat) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO EXTEND /REOPEN TIME TO FILE APPEAL; DECLARATION, filed by plaintiff Brayan Martin Meza. (mat) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (es)
|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Pursuant to the Court's Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. #4 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (es)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Brayan Martin Meza. (lh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.(Filing Fee $5 DUE), filed by Petitioner Brayan Martin Meza. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brayan Martin Meza v. Marcus Pollard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Marcus Pollard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brayan Martin Meza | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
