Ash Newell v. Los Angeles Times Communications LLC
| Ash Newell |
| Los Angeles Times Communications LLC |
| 2:2021cv04293 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| John F Walter |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Notice) (iv) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Ash Newell. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ash Newell, upon Defendant Los Angeles Times Communications LLC served on 5/27/2021, answer due 6/17/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Amy Mclaren, Managing Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Craig Sanders re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 pursuant to Standing Order Paragraph 3(a) filed by Plaintiff Ash Newell. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles Times Communications LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ash Newell, identifying Barshay Sanders, PLLC, Craig B. Sanders, Los Angeles Times Communications LLC. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Ash Newell. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ash Newell. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ash Newell. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31342785 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Ash Newell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Ash Newell(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ash Newell v. Los Angeles Times Communications LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Los Angeles Times Communications LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ash Newell | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
