Daniel Navarro v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
Daniel Navarro |
Kylie Garcia, CR England Inc, C.R. England, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 |
2:2021cv04563 |
June 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A Oliver |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #10 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (dml) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Agreement to Proceed to Individual Arbitration filed by Defendant C.R. England, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Boyer, J) |
Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (dml) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to C.R. England, Inc. answer now due 7/9/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant C.R. England, Inc..(Boyer, J) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant C.R. England, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 served on June 3, 2021. (Boyer, J) |
Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant C.R. England, Inc., Proof of Service of Notice to Adverse Parties of Removal to Federal Court served on June 3, 2021. (Boyer, J) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Navarro, upon Defendant C.R. England, Inc. served on 5/4/2021, answer due 5/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service, agent for service of process-by handing to Trudy Desbiens, customer service liaison in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/18/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 6) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants C.R. England, Inc., Does 1 through 50, Kylie Garcia. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Daniel Navarro. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/30/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 (ghap) |
Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CR England Inc, (Boyer, J) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant CR England Inc (Boyer, J) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant CR England Inc. (Boyer, J) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV16588 Receipt No: ACACDC-31398178 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant CR England Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Declaration of Lisa Callister, #9 Declaration of Kylie Garcia) (Attorney J Randall Boyer added to party CR England Inc(pty:dft))(Boyer, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.