Tyrone L. McRae v. Benny Diaz et al
Tyrone L. McRae |
Kevin Jackson, Steven Perez, Benny Diaz and George Munoz |
2:2021cv04719 |
June 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
George H Wu |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: denying #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. Re APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (mrgo) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner, filed by Plaintiff Tyrone L. McRae. (lh) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Benny Diaz(Mental Health Escort/Correctional Officer, official capacity), Benny Diaz(Mental Helath Escort/Correctional Officier, individual), Kevin Jackson(Segregation Lieutenant, individual), Kevin Jackson(Segregation Lieutenant, official capacity), George Munoz, Steven Perez pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Filed by Plaintiff Tyrone L. McRae. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.