Dibs McCallum v. Sunsetcast LLC
Plaintiff: Dibs McCallum
Defendant: Sunsetcast LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv04844
Filed: June 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2021 Filing 13 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/10/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 9/24/2021 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti)
August 9, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Sunsetcast LLC. (Attachments: #1 Defendant's Certification and Notice of Interested Parties, #2 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Ameli, Chantelle)
July 13, 2021 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sunsetcast LLC answer now due 8/11/2021, filed by Defendant Sunsetcast LLC.(Attorney Chantelle Shirin Ameli added to party Sunsetcast LLC(pty:dft))(Ameli, Chantelle)
June 25, 2021 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum, upon Defendant Sunsetcast LLC served on 6/21/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ian V; Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
June 15, 2021 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sunsetcast LLC. (ghap)
June 15, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
June 15, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap)
June 15, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum, identifying Barshay Sanders, PLLC, Craig B. Sanders, Sunsetcast LLC. (Sanders, Craig)
June 15, 2021 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Dibs McCallum. (Sanders, Craig)
June 15, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum. (Sanders, Craig)
June 15, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum. (Sanders, Craig)
June 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31465300 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Dibs McCallum(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dibs McCallum v. Sunsetcast LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunsetcast LLC
Represented By: Mark K Ameli
Represented By: Chantelle Shirin Ameli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dibs McCallum
Represented By: Craig B Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?