Dibs McCallum v. Sunsetcast LLC
Dibs McCallum |
Sunsetcast LLC |
2:2021cv04844 |
June 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Gail J Standish |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/10/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 9/24/2021 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Sunsetcast LLC. (Attachments: #1 Defendant's Certification and Notice of Interested Parties, #2 Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Ameli, Chantelle) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sunsetcast LLC answer now due 8/11/2021, filed by Defendant Sunsetcast LLC.(Attorney Chantelle Shirin Ameli added to party Sunsetcast LLC(pty:dft))(Ameli, Chantelle) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum, upon Defendant Sunsetcast LLC served on 6/21/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ian V; Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sunsetcast LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum, identifying Barshay Sanders, PLLC, Craig B. Sanders, Sunsetcast LLC. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Dibs McCallum. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31465300 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Dibs McCallum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Dibs McCallum(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dibs McCallum v. Sunsetcast LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sunsetcast LLC | |
Represented By: | Mark K Ameli |
Represented By: | Chantelle Shirin Ameli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dibs McCallum | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.