Alonzo Trevon Talley v. T. Cisneros
| Alonzo Trevon Talley |
| T. Cisneros |
| 2:2021cv05058 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is GRANTED and Respondent is granted to and including August 22, 2021, within which to file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and to and including September 7, 2021, within which to file an Answer in the alternative. #7 (es)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL filed by respondent T. Cisneros. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aarons, Kim) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kim Aarons on behalf of Respondent T. Cisneros (Attorney Kim Aarons added to party T. Cisneros(pty:res))(Aarons, Kim) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION; DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: Petitioner's request for IFP status is DENIED. Respondent should file and serve an answer to the Petition within 45 days of the date of this Order. Motion todismiss shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order. [See order for details.] (Attachments: #1 Attachment.Petition) (es)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by petitioner Alonzo Trevon Talley. The petitioner does not consent. (esa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth,(Filing fee $ 5 due), filed by petitioner Alonzo Trevon Talley. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Alonzo Trevon Talley v. T. Cisneros | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. Cisneros | |
| Represented By: | Kim Aarons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Alonzo Trevon Talley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
