Calley-Rae Pavillard v. Fanatics, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Caley-Rae Pavillard
Defendant: Fanatics, Inc., Does 1-10 inclusive and Fanatics Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv06508
Filed: August 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter. As a result of the parties' failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's Order of August 13, 2021, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference, currently on calendar for September 20, 2021, is VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
August 31, 2021 Filing 14 Proof of Service filed by Plaintiff Caley-Rae Pavillard (Hall, Timothy)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY by Judge John F. Walter: Granting Substituting attorney Roger Yvon Muse for Caley-Rae Pavillard in place and stead of attorney Timothy A Hall. (lom)
August 30, 2021 Filing 12 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY)(Hall, Timothy)
August 19, 2021 Filing 11 DECLARATION of James Smith Declaration of Lead Trial Counsel Re: Compliance With Local Rules Governing Electronic Filing filed by Defendant Fanatics Inc.. (Smith, James)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for September 20, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before September 1, 2021. (iv)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
August 13, 2021 Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 50, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 12, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa)
August 12, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
August 12, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa)
August 11, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Fanatics, Inc., filed by plaintiff Caley-Rae Pavillard. (filed in state court 6/16/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)
August 11, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fanatics, Inc., identifying Fanatics Retail Group Fulfillment, LLC, Fanatics Retail Group South, LLC, Fanatics Holdings, Inc.,. (Chapman, Kendra)
August 11, 2021 Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Fanatics, Inc... (Chapman, Kendra)
August 11, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Fanatics, Inc.. (Chapman, Kendra)
August 11, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21stcv22571 Receipt No: BCACDC-31792545 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Fanatics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Kendra Charell Chapman added to party Fanatics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chapman, Kendra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calley-Rae Pavillard v. Fanatics, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caley-Rae Pavillard
Represented By: Roger Yvon Muse
Represented By: Timothy A Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fanatics, Inc.
Represented By: Kendra Charell Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fanatics Inc.
Represented By: James Alan Neal Smith
Represented By: Kendra Charell Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?