Maynor Galindo v. Phillips 66 Company et al
Plaintiff: Maynor Galindo
Defendant: Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC, Phillips 66 Spectrum Corporation, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv07522
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Maynor Galindo. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Setareh, Chaim)
October 27, 2021 Filing 18 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants DOES, Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC, Phillips 66 Spectrum Corporation amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Maynor Galindo(Setareh, Chaim)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #16 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court hereby grants Plaintiff leave to file the amended complaint attached to the parties' joint stipulation as Exhibit A. Defendants are ordered to answer or otherwise respond via a motion to dismiss, stay and/or transfer by not later than November 10, 2021. (lom)
October 25, 2021 Filing 16 STIPULATION to Amend Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Plaintiff Maynor Galindo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Setareh, Chaim)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 [Minute Order] SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court held a Scheduling Conference in this case on October 22, 2021. The Court noted that the complaint in this case, Dkt. o. 1-1, is largely identical to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) in another case before Chief Judge Seeborg in the Northern District of California, Robbins v. Phillips Co., Case No. 3:18-cv-00292-RS (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. No. 102-1. There are seven causes of action in the Robbins FAC and six causes of action in the Galindo complaint. The two complaints also seek the exact same thirteen forms of relief. The Court hereby orders the following: Plaintiff is ordered to file a redline comparison between his complaint in this case and the Robbins FAC not later than 2 p.m. today; The parties are ordered to meet and confer today about the possibilityof Plaintiff amending his complaint; Should the parties agree on amendment, any amended complaint must be filed not later than Monday, October 25th. See attached minute order for details. (lom)
October 22, 2021 Filing 14 DECLARATION of Shaun Setareh Submitting Redlined Version of First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Maynor Galindo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Setareh, Chaim)
October 18, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Maynor Galindo, identifying Maynor Galindo. (Setareh, Chaim)
October 12, 2021 Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 court days, filed by Plaintiff Maynor Galindo.. (Setareh, Chaim)
September 27, 2021 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Maynor Galindo answer now due 10/27/2021, filed by Defendants Phillips 66 Spectrum Corporation; Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC; Phillips 66 Company.(Attorney Nicholas D Poper added to party Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas D Poper added to party Phillips 66 Spectrum Corporation(pty:dft))(Poper, Nicholas)
September 24, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Phillips 66 Company, served on September 20, 2021 and September 24, 2021. (Poper, Nicholas)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (MSC) ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. File the Joint Rule 26(f) Report (Report) no later than ten daysbefore the scheduling conference. See document for further details. (gk)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
September 22, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
September 22, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
September 22, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil)
September 20, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Maynor Galindo in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/17/2021, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil)
September 20, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Phillips 66 Company, (Poper, Nicholas)
September 20, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Phillips 66 Company. (Poper, Nicholas)
September 20, 2021 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE in Support of Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court filed by Defendant Phillips 66 Company. (Poper, Nicholas)
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV30310 Receipt No: ACACDC-32013169 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Phillips 66 Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint) (Attorney Nicholas D Poper added to party Phillips 66 Company(pty:dft))(Poper, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maynor Galindo v. Phillips 66 Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maynor Galindo
Represented By: Chaim Shaun Setareh
Represented By: Farrah Beverly Grant
Represented By: Thomas Alistair Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips 66 Company
Represented By: Nicholas D Poper
Represented By: Michael S Chamberlin
Represented By: Vartan Serge Madoyan
Represented By: Vivian Yuxi Shen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC
Represented By: Nicholas D Poper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips 66 Spectrum Corporation
Represented By: Nicholas D Poper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?