Devin Sejas v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Devin Sejas |
| County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Alex Villanueva, City of Compton, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, Alex Sheriff Villanueva and Does 1 to 100, Inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07553 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 12/19/22. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 15
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/13/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 3/14/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Devin Sejas.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Joint Rule 26(f) Report (Exhibit A))(King, Stephen) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Dismissing Defendant City of Compton With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) #11 . See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant City of Compton filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, City of Compton, Alex Sheriff Villanueva, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bustos, Oscar) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 11/29/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (jgr)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant City of Compton, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, Alex Sheriff Villanueva.(Bustos, Oscar) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 10/12/2021; City of Compton answer now due 10/12/2021; Los Angeles Sheriffs Department answer now due 10/12/2021; Alex Sheriff Villanueva answer now due 10/12/2021, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Bustos, Oscar) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Devin Sejas, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Katherine Medina-Deputy Director in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/24/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 8) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Compton, County of Los Angeles, Does 1 to 100, Inclusive, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, Alex Sheriff Villanueva. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Devin Sejas. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/2/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Devin Sejas, upon Defendant Los Angeles Sheriffs Department served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Katherine Medina-Deputy Director in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/24/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 9) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Devin Sejas, upon Defendant City of Compton served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vernell McDaniel-Chief Deputy City Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/24/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 10) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Devin Sejas, upon Defendant Alex Sheriff Villanueva served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jahel Saucedo-Senior Secretary to County Counsel in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/25/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 11) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Compton, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Alex Villanueva, (Attorney Oscar Andres Bustos added to party City of Compton(pty:dft), Attorney Oscar Andres Bustos added to party Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (pty:dft), Attorney Oscar Andres Bustos added to party Sheriff Alex Villanueva(pty:dft))(Bustos, Oscar) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Bustos, Oscar) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21CMCV00168 Receipt No: ACACDC-32022850 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit) (Attorney Oscar Andres Bustos added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Bustos, Oscar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
