Kali Massey v. Wescom Central Credit Union et al
Kali Massey |
Wescom Central Credit Union and Does 1 through 5, inclusive |
2:2021cv07622 |
September 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Karen L Stevenson |
Banks and Banking |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #16 , Notice of Appearance #17 , Notice of Appearance #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Wescom Central Credit Union answer now due 12/10/2021, filed by Defendant Wescom Central Credit Union.(Richter, Stuart) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Camille A Brooks on behalf of Defendant Wescom Central Credit Union (Attorney Camille A Brooks added to party Wescom Central Credit Union(pty:dft))(Brooks, Camille) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Andrew John Demko on behalf of Defendant Wescom Central Credit Union (Attorney Andrew John Demko added to party Wescom Central Credit Union(pty:dft))(Demko, Andrew) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Stuart M Richter on behalf of Defendant Wescom Central Credit Union (Attorney Stuart M Richter added to party Wescom Central Credit Union(pty:dft))(Richter, Stuart) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Kali Massey, designating David C. Wright as local counsel. (mrgo) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kali Massey (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32200134) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. (lt) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kali Massey (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32200134) filed by Plaintiff Kali Massey. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk) (Wright, David) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (et) |
Filing 11 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-07622 PA(KSx). (rn) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Emily J. Kirk on behalf of Plaintiff Kali Massey. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. I have not received updated certificates of good standing from the State Bars in which I am admitted to practice. Application will be filed as soon as these are received by my office. (lt) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Wescom Central Credit Union. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kali Massey. (Wright, David) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kali Massey, (Wright, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kali Massey. (Wright, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32039857 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Kali Massey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Opt In Agreement) (Attorney David C. Wright added to party Kali Massey(pty:pla))(Wright, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.