Bernhard Kuhmstedt v. Penske Media Corporation et al
| Bernhard Kuhmstedt |
| Penske Media Corporation, DOES 1 through 10, Penske Media Corporation a Delaware Corporation, individually doing business as Hollywoodlife.com and Hollywoodlife.com, LLC |
| 2:2021cv08219 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Ntc Vol Dism) (shb) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Burroughs, Scott) |
Filing 15
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Amended Complaint/Petition #9 filed by Defendant Hollywoodlife.com, LLC.(Attorney William A Delgado added to party Hollywoodlife.com, LLC(pty:dft))(Delgado, William) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt, upon Defendant Hollywoodlife.com, LLC served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agents Solutions Inc. c/o Justin Woods - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt. upon Penske Media Corporation waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/21/2021, answer due 12/20/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Shilpa Coorg, Esq. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re First ended Complaint/Petition #9 as to Defendants Hollywoodlife.com, LLC, Penske Media Corporation. (shb) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #9 filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Penske Media Corporation, Hollywoodlife.com, LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt(Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Penske Media Corporation. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Bernhard Kuhmstedt. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt, identifying PENSKE MEDIA CORPORATION. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32162673 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Bernhard Kuhmstedt. (Attorney Scott A. Burroughs added to party Bernhard Kuhmstedt(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
