Latoya Hansborough v. Candid Care Co. et al
Plaintiff: Latoya Hansborough
Defendant: Candid Care Co., Ashlee Lark and Does 1-100 inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv08343
Filed: October 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen L Stevenson
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of the December 16, 2021 Notice of Settlement #10 , which states that the parties have settled the matter, this action is placed on inactive status. By January 15, 2022, the parties shall file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. All dates and deadlines in this action, including the January 3, 2022 scheduling conference, are VACATED and taken off calendar. (lc)
December 16, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE Of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Latoya Hansborough. (Elias, Imad)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for January 3, 2022 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
October 21, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
October 21, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
October 21, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap)
October 21, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ASHLEE LARKS NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1332(a) and 1441(b) filed by Defendant CANDID CARE CO., A CORPORATION. (Krueger, Corey)
October 21, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant CANDID CARE CO., A CORPORATION. (Krueger, Corey)
October 21, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT CANDID CARE CO., A CORPORATION, identifying LATOYA HANSBOROUGH, CANDID CARE CO., ASHLEE LARK, A CORPORATION, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (Krueger, Corey)
October 21, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from LOS ANGELES, case number 21STCV17903 Receipt No: ACACDC-32192828 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANT CANDID CARE CO., A CORPORATION. (Attorney Corey Edward Krueger added to party CANDID CARE CO., A CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Krueger, Corey)
October 21, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Ashlee Lark. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/20/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap)
October 21, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Candid Care Co., Does 1-100 inclusive, Ashlee Lark. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Latoya Hansborough. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/12/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
October 21, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Candid Care Co. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/29/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Latoya Hansborough v. Candid Care Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoya Hansborough
Represented By: Imad Younan Elias
Represented By: Sofya Asatryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Candid Care Co.
Represented By: Corey Edward Krueger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashlee Lark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?