Anthony Coleman et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Anthony Coleman and Shaneece Flax |
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Jesus Chamorro, Christian Silva-Rubio, Joseph Marsik, Christopher Allende, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Christian Silvia-Rubio and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
2:2021cv08346 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for January 24, 2022 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Joynt, Karen) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court is in receipt of the parties' Stipulation Extending the Time to Answer #10 . However, the parties calculated dates and deadlines appear to be incorrect. The parties state that Defendant County of Los Angeles was served on September 23, 2021. This means the County's current deadline to respond is October 14, 2021not October 28, 2021, as the parties have asserted. Thus, the 30-day extension under Local Rule 8-3 only extends the County's deadline to respond to November 13, 2021. Any additional extension will require a request to, and approval by, the Court. (lc) |
Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 11/29/2021, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Hayati Rezvan, Paniz) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Christopher Allende, Jesus Chamorro, County of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Joseph Marsik, Christian Silvia-Rubio. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Shaneece Flax, Anthony Coleman. Filed in State Court on 8/20/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (car) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Hayati Rezvan, Paniz) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Hayati Rezvan, Paniz) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Paniz Hayati Rezvan counsel for Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Adding Karen Joynt as counsel of record for Defendant County of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Hayati Rezvan, Paniz) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV30890 Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint) (Attorney Paniz Hayati Rezvan added to party COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:dft))(Hayati Rezvan, Paniz) |
FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-32196949 for $402 filing fee. (Hayati Rezvan, Paniz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.