Anand et al v. United States of America et al
Kulvinder Kaur Anand and Genes market Circle K |
United States of America and Tom Vilsack |
2:2021cv08620 |
November 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
George H Wu |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE before Judge George H. Wu: The Court continues the status conference to 1/6/2022 at 8:30 AM. The parties are to file a joint report by noon on 1/4/2022.Court Reporter: Terri A. Hourigan. (jp) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE ON AN AGENCY OR CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES Executed by Plaintiff Kulvinder Kaur Anand, upon Defendant United States of America served on 12/7/2021, answer due 2/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to O. Ortiz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to not indicated. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (bm) |
Filing 13 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendant Tom Vilsack. (mrgo) |
![]() |
Filing 11 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel are to appear telephonically for Monday's 11/29/2021 Motion Hearing #4 at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
![]() |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
Filing 6 PLAINTIFF DECLARATION in Support of Motion Summary of Judgement Relief from Disqualification and Stay of Execution re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION Stay of Disqualification Penalties Injunctive Relief FNs's Final Agency Decision #4 filed by Plaintiff Kulvinder Kaur Anand. (lh) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Plaintiff Kulvinder Kaur Anand. Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION Stay of Disqualification Penalties Injunctive Relief FNS's Final Agency Decision #4 (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION Stay of Disqualification Penalties Injunctive Relief FNS's Final Agency Decision, filed by Plaintiff Kulvinder Kaur Anand. Motion set for hearing on 11/29/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (lh) |
Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by mail filed by Plaintiff Kulvinder Kaur Anand, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 served on 10/29/2021. (lh) |
Filing 2 PROOF OF SERVICE by mail filed by Plaintiff Kulvinder Kaur Anand, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 served on 10/29/2021. (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants United States of America, Tom Vilsack. Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish.(Filing Fee $402 PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Kulvinder Kaur Anand. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.