Paula Gamble v. Synchrony Bank et al
| Paula Gamble |
| Synchrony Bank and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv09865 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Sheri Pym. New Case Number 5:21-cv-02144-JWH-SPx. (car) |
| Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on December 22, 2021. (Warner, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank. (Warner, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside, case number COC1906160 Receipt No: ACACDC-32523306 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Synchrony Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 State Court Documents) (Attorney Steven P Warner added to party Synchrony Bank(pty:dft))(Warner, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
