NAFTA Traders, Inc. v. Adidas America, Inc
| Adidas America, Inc |
| NAFTA TRADERS, INC. |
| Bordan Shoe Company |
| 2:2021mc01077 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) MINUTE ORDER RE: AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL, DKT. #13 by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: The Court ORDERS that Bordan shall file an Opposition no later than December 8, 2021. The Motion to Compel will be taken under submission when briefing is complete, without a hearing, unless ordered otherwise. Accordingly, the December 8, 2021 hearing is VACATED. [See document for further information.] (es)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Withdraw Prior Motion, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend Motion to Compel filed by plaintiff NAFTA Traders, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Subpoena, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit Correspondence) (Tillotson, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTES (In Chambers) MINUTE ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL, DKT. #1 by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file a Reply no later than November 23, 2021. The Motion to Compel will be taken under submission when briefing is complete, without a hearing, unless ordered otherwise. re: MISC - Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District, #1 [See document for further details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: granting #6 Non-Resident Attorney Braden M. Wayne APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Nafta Trader, designating Jeffrey M. Tillotson as local counsel. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING NOTICE - IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: NOTICE of Hearing filed by Plaintiff NAFTA Traders, Inc) #8 - The hearing set for 11/1/2021 at 1:30 p.m., is vacated and off-calendar. A hearing for a motion to compel production of documents should be noticed before the Honorable Margo A. Rocconi, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately file a corrected Notice on the Motion. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Pursuant to Subpoena, filed by Respondent Bordan Shoe Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Randall S. Leff)(Attorney Randall S Leff added to party Bordan Shoe Company(pty:res))(Leff, Randall) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing filed by Plaintiff NAFTA Traders, Inc.. (Tillotson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Braden M. Wayne to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Movant NAFTA Traders, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32168506) #6 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing date set, but no hearing required. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. (lt) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Braden M. Wayne to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Movant NAFTA Traders, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32168506) filed by plaintiff NAFTA Traders, Inc.. Application set for hearing on 11/3/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Tillotson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 Nafta Traders, Inc. NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Nafta All Plaintiffs, (Tillotson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Braden M Wayne. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (esa) |
| Filing 1 MOTION RELATED TO A SUBPOENA FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: ACACDC-32125037 - Fee: $49, filed by PLAINTIFF NAFTA TRADERS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order) (Attorney Jeffrey M. Tillotson added to party NAFTA TRADERS, INC.(pty:bkmov))(Tillotson, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
