Devonte Fields v. J. Pritched et al
| Devonte Fields |
| J. Pritched, D. Jones, E. Zeno, Does 1-10 Unknown Correctional Officer, CDCR transportation officer and Does 2nd |
| 2:2022cv00125 |
| January 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #3 by Judge R. Gary Klausner that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (jp)
|
| Filing 13 Text Only Entry re Order #8 mailed to the Legal Department at the California Men's Colony, P.O. Box 8101, San Luis Obispo, CA 93409. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ev) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 Text Only Entry re Forwarded to the United States Marshal: Summons Issued #10 , Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 , Summons Issued #11 , Summons Issued #9 , Order #7 for service of process. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ev) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 as to Defendant E. Zeno. (es) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 as to Defendant D. Jones. (es) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 as to Defendant J. Pritched. (es) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, The United States Marshal is ordered to serve the summons and Complaint, Dkt. 1, as indicated on the concurrently filed Order Directing Service of Process by the United States Marshal ("Service Order"). re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 [See order for further details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 [See document for details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: Granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $3.74 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (es)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT Federal: Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 65(a) "Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order" filed by Plaintiff Devonte Fields (car) |
| Filing 3 Immediate Relief Requested Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction And Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff Devonte Fields. (car) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Devonte Fields. (car) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, filed by Plaintiff Devonte Fields. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
