Kathleen F. Bowering v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Kathleen F. Bowering
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2022cv00635
Filed: January 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: John A Kronstadt
2 Judge: Christina A Snyder
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Glen H Sturtevant, Jr., APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering, designating Peter G Bertling as local counsel. (jp)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Brewster S Rawls APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering, designating Peter G Bertling as local counsel. (jp)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
February 10, 2022 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering, upon Defendant United States of America served on 2/3/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Name illegible. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Bertling, Peter)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-00635 JAK(MAAx). (rn)
February 9, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brewster S. Rawls to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32758700) #12 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32758857) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Other error(s) with document(s): The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section 1 of this Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in Section II, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (lt)
February 8, 2022 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32758857) filed by Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Bertling, Peter)
February 8, 2022 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brewster S. Rawls to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32758700) filed by Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Bertling, Peter)
January 28, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kathleen F. Bowering, identifying United States of America. (Bertling, Peter)
January 28, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et)
January 28, 2022 Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America for U.S. Attorney General. (et)
January 28, 2022 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (et)
January 28, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
January 28, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
January 28, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et)
January 28, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Kathleen F Bowering, Estate of Melissa F. Robinson. (Bertling, Peter)
January 28, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Kathleen F Bowering, Estate of Melissa F. Robinson. (Bertling, Peter)
January 28, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movants Kathleen F Bowering, Estate of Melissa F. Robinson. (Bertling, Peter)
January 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32701856 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Estate of Melissa F. Robinson, Kathleen F Bowering. (Attorney Peter G Bertling added to party Kathleen F Bowering(pty:bkmov), Attorney Peter G Bertling added to party Estate of Melissa F. Robinson(pty:bkmov))(Bertling, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kathleen F. Bowering v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen F. Bowering
Represented By: Peter G Bertling
Represented By: Brewster S. Rawls
Represented By: Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?