Neil Breitbard v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Neil Breitbard |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Guillermo Viera Rosa, State Of California, Dr. Jeffrey A. Beard, Robert J. Ambroselli and DOES 1 through 21 |
| 2:2022cv00653 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Robert J. Ambroselli, Jeffrey A. Beard, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, DOES 1 through 21, State Of California; Party Guillermo Viera Rosa terminated, amending Complaint #1 , filed by Plaintiff Neil Breitbard (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(hr) |
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 . The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he must file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil Rights Complaint Form, #2 Blank Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, ORDERING Summons - CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation submitted by Plaintiff Neil Breitbard, received on 2/15/22, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: The Court has not authorized service of the complaint, so these summons are premature. (hr)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, ORDERING Summons - Guillermo Viera Rosa submitted by Plaintiff Neil Breitbard, received on 2/15/22, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: The Court has not authorized service of the complaint, so these summons are premature. (hr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. (hr)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to United States District Court, Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *United States District Court, Central District of California, Western Division*.*255 East Temple Street**Los Angeles, CA 90012-3332*. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 1/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order Transferring Action) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (fth) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/1/2022.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Neil Breitbard. (sjt) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/1/2022.] Modified on 2/1/2022 (ghap). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Guillermo Viera Rosa, IFP Filed. Filed by Neil Breitbard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-27-TWR-BLM. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Neil Brietbard)(sjt) [Transferred from California Southern on 2/1/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
