Antonio Fernandez v. ABA Enterprises, LLC,
Antonio Fernandez |
ABA Enterprises, LLC, |
2:2022cv02212 |
April 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Smith, Bradley) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant ABA Enterprises, LLC,. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Elliott Charles Montgomery on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Elliott Charles Montgomery added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Montgomery, Elliott) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bradley Alan Smith on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Bradley Alan Smith added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Smith, Bradley) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33062799 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Antonio Fernandez v. ABA Enterprises, LLC, | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Antonio Fernandez | |
Represented By: | Amanda Lockhart Seabock |
Represented By: | Dennis Jay Price, II |
Represented By: | Bradley Alan Smith |
Represented By: | Chris Carson |
Represented By: | Elliott Charles Montgomery |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ABA Enterprises, LLC, | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.