Antonio Fernandez v. ABA Enterprises, LLC,
Plaintiff: Antonio Fernandez
Defendant: ABA Enterprises, LLC,
Case Number: 2:2022cv02212
Filed: April 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
May 9, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Smith, Bradley)
April 6, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant ABA Enterprises, LLC,. (jtil)
April 6, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil)
April 5, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Elliott Charles Montgomery on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Elliott Charles Montgomery added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Montgomery, Elliott)
April 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bradley Alan Smith on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Bradley Alan Smith added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Smith, Bradley)
April 3, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda)
April 3, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, (Seabock, Amanda)
April 3, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda)
April 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33062799 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antonio Fernandez v. ABA Enterprises, LLC,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Fernandez
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Bradley Alan Smith
Represented By: Chris Carson
Represented By: Elliott Charles Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABA Enterprises, LLC,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?