Alcom 3PL, Inc. v. Sun Group Partners LLC et al
| Alcon 3PL, Inc. |
| Sun Group Partners LLC, Glenn Sands, Brent Sands and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv02523 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Brent Sands, Glenn Sands, Sun Group Partners LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ALCON 3PL, INC.. (Kohan, K.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ALCON 3PL, INC., (Kohan, K.) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff ALCON 3PL, INC.. (Kohan, K.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33129573 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff ALCON 3PL, INC.. (Attorney K. Tom Kohan added to party ALCON 3PL, INC.(pty:pla))(Kohan, K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
