Margaret Schaub v. Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al
Margaret Schaub |
Mullen Automotive, Inc., David Michery, Oleg Firer and Net Element, Inc. |
2:2022cv03026 |
May 5, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Oleg Firer, David Michery, Mullen Automotive, Inc. (car) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Margaret Schaub. (Rosen, Laurence) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Margaret Schaub, (Rosen, Laurence) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Margaret Schaub. (Rosen, Laurence) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33246824 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Margaret Schaub. (Attachments: #1 PSLRA Certification) (Attorney Laurence M Rosen added to party Margaret Schaub(pty:pla))(Rosen, Laurence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.