Houri Liza Johnston v. United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service
Houri Liza Johnston |
United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service |
2:2022cv03631 |
May 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 09/13/2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Approving Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by 45 Days)(Attorney Angela Gill added to party United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service(pty:dft))(Gill, Angela) |
Filing 17 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service. (shb) |
Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Houri Liza Johnston. (Young, Linette) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form, #13 by Deputy Clerk of Court. The documents are hereby STRICKEN. Counsel is DIRECTED to cure the deficiencies provided in the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies [ECF No. 13] by refiling the documents properly. For further assistance, counsel may contact the CM/ECF Helpdesk at: (213) 894-0242, or by email at: ecf-helpdesk@cacd.uscourts.gov. (iva) |
![]() |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (30 day), #10 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #11 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: This is not a proof of Service of Summons and Complaint nor was it served under FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) as the Court did not serve the summons. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Service Documents Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints - Select - Summons Issued. Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): The complete case number is 2:22cv03631 SSS (JPRx). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 12 **DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ECF NO. 15** PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Houri Liza Johnston, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Young, Linette) Modified on 6/29/2022 (iva). |
Filing 11 **DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ECF NO. 15** PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Houri Liza Johnston, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Young, Linette) Modified on 6/29/2022 (iva). |
Filing 10 **DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ECF NO. 15** SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Defendant Houri Liza Johnston, upon Defendant United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Young, Linette) Modified on 6/29/2022 (iva). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Houri Liza Johnston, (Young, Linette) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Houri Liza Johnston. (Young, Linette) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33370279 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Houri Liza Johnston. (Attorney Linette Behrschmidt Young added to party Houri Liza Johnston(pty:pla))(Young, Linette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Houri Liza Johnston v. United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Houri Liza Johnston | |
Represented By: | Linette Behrschmidt Young |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States, and its agency, the Internal Revenue Service | |
Represented By: | Angela Gill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.