San Antonio Winery, Inc. v. Boutique Du Chateau De Cayx et al
| San Antonio Winery, Inc. |
| Boutique Du Chateau De Cayx and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2022cv04313 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by San Antonio Winery, Inc.. (Sheldon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff San Antonio Winery, Inc.. (Sheldon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff San Antonio Winery, Inc., identifying San Antonio Winery, Inc. and Boutique Du Chateau De Cayx. (Sheldon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff San Antonio Winery, Inc.. (Sheldon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff San Antonio Winery, Inc.. (Sheldon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33516319 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff San Antonio Winery, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Jeffrey G Sheldon added to party San Antonio Winery, Inc.(pty:pla))(Sheldon, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
