Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
Plaintiff: Juan Chavez, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant: Jermill Pennington
Case Number: 2:2022cv04763
Filed: July 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: Mark C Scarsi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #17 filed by Juan Chavez. CCA # 22-55747. A review of this court's docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [See Order for further information.](car)
August 9, 2022 Filing 19 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 22-55747 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #17 as to plaintiff Juan Chavez. (lc)
August 5, 2022 Filing 18 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis to the 9th CCA re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #17 . [Document forward to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.] (mat)
August 5, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Juan Chavez. Appeal of Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #12 , Order on Motion to Transfer Case, #4 , Order on Motion for Order,, Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #15 Filed On: 7/11/22, 7/18/22 and 8/1/22; Entered On: 7/14/22, 7/18/22 and 8/1/22; Motion for In forma Paupers filed for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. (mat)
August 1, 2022 Filing 16 JUDGMENT #15 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Pursuant to the Court's Order of Dismissal, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this case is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL (ECF Nos. #13 - #14 ) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 13), denies Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 14), dismisses the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and directs the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case. See minute order for details. (lom)
July 19, 2022 Filing 14 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Juan Chavez. (lom)
July 19, 2022 Filing 13 REQUEST Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff Juan Chavez. (lom)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER TO SHOW CASE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall file a written response within 14 days. Failure to file a timely and satisfactory response will result in dismissal without further notice. (lc)
July 14, 2022 Filing 11 TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, she/he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Court's website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (note that the clinic may not be open for in-person appointments during the pandemic). Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
July 14, 2022 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
July 14, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
July 14, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap)
July 14, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 3:22-cv-1474-M-BH, from Northern District of Texas (Dallas). The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:22-cv-4763-MCS (AS). (ghap)
July 14, 2022 Filing 5 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Texas Northern
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF TRANSFER: Plaintiff's complaint is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/11/2022) (jmg) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 7/14/2022.]
July 11, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Mon Jul 11 08:33:12 CDT 2022 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 7/14/2022.]
July 8, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Jermill Pennington filed by Juan Chavez. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. ***FILED USING EMERGENCY EMAIL*** (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (twd) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 7/14/2022.]
July 8, 2022 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (twd) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 7/14/2022.]
July 8, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1. Fri Jul 8 10:56:06 CDT 2022 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 7/14/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juan Chavez v. Jermill Pennington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chief Maestro Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Pablo Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jermill Pennington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?