Dryft Sciences, LLC v. Swedish Match North America, LLC
Plaintiff: Dryft Sciences, LLC
Defendant: Swedish Match North America, LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv05355
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Maura E. Miller APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Dryft Sciences, LLC, designating Colin W. Fraser as local counsel. (lom)
August 31, 2022 Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Maura E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC Dkt. No. #12 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The document (Dkt. No. #12 ) is stricken. Counsel have refiled the application at Dkt. No. #14 . The Court reminds the filer to carefully review notices issued by the Clerk prior to refiling applications for the Court's consideration - The Notice to Filer of Deficiencies at Dkt. No. #13 states the filer "need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so." (jgr)
August 31, 2022 Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Maura E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 8/30/2022, Receipt No. 33897565) filed by Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fraser, Colin)
August 30, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Maura E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33897565) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed for either applicant or local counsel. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt)
August 30, 2022 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Maura E. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33897565) filed by Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fraser, Colin)
August 11, 2022 Filing 11 Swedish Match North America WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC. upon Swedish Match North America, LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/10/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Brian Byrne. (Bloch, David)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-01322 SB(MRWx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge Fernando M. Olguin to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-05355 SB(MRWx). Signed by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr (rn)
August 3, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Swedish Match North America, LLC. (et)
August 3, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
August 3, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
August 3, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et)
August 2, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC. (Bloch, David)
August 2, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC identifying Kretek International, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Bloch, David)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC. (Bloch, David)
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-33733528 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Dryft Sciences, LLC. (Attorney David Spencer Bloch added to party Dryft Sciences, LLC(pty:pla))(Bloch, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dryft Sciences, LLC v. Swedish Match North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dryft Sciences, LLC
Represented By: David Spencer Bloch
Represented By: Colin W. Fraser
Represented By: Maura E. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swedish Match North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?