Ganesh Ghosh v. Carnival PLC et al
Plaintiff: Ganesh Ghosh
Defendant: Carnival PLC, trading as Cunard Line, Fleet Maritime Services International Ltd. and Carnival PLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv05385
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 688 Jones Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eduardo J. Hernandez to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh and designating Aksana M. Coone as local counsel #14 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
August 5, 2022 Filing 14 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eduardo J. Hernandez to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 8/3/2022, Receipt No. 33748710) filed by Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Coone, Aksana)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: denying #10 Non-Resident Attorney Eduardo J. Hernandez APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Ganesh Ghosh. (lom)
August 4, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eduardo J. Hernandez to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33748710) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Order has not been flattened and is causing a corruption with the filing. (lt)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central District's website for additional information. See minute order for details. (lom)
August 3, 2022 Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eduardo J. Hernandez to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33748710) filed by Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Coone, Aksana)
August 3, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Carnival PLC, Fleet Maritime Services International Ltd. (car)
August 3, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Eduardo J Hernandez. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
August 3, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
August 3, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
August 3, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (car)
August 2, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh, (Coone, Aksana)
August 2, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh. (Coone, Aksana)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh. (Coone, Aksana)
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Plaintiff Ganesh Ghosh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through M to Complaint) (Attorney Aksana Moshaiv Coone added to party Ganesh Ghosh(pty:pla))(Coone, Aksana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ganesh Ghosh v. Carnival PLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ganesh Ghosh
Represented By: Aksana Moshaiv Coone
Represented By: Eduardo J. Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carnival PLC, trading as Cunard Line
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fleet Maritime Services International Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carnival PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?