Guri Gonzalez v. MMH, LLC. et al
Guri Gonzalez |
MMH, LLC., MMH, LLC. Erroneously Sued As Peter Manhon doing business as MMH Liquor store and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2022cv05794 |
August 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez, upon Defendant MMH, LLC. served on 9/12/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon MAHER HANOUN, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On September 14, 2022, Peter Mahon filed a document entitled "Defendant's Answer" on behalf of Defendant MMH, Liquor, erroneously sued as MMH, LLC. Mr. Mahon has not provided a state bar number and does not appear to be an attorney. (Id.) Although a non-attorney may appear in propria persona in his own behalf, that privilege ispersonal to him." "He has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself." Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the Answer #14 . Legal representation is not required for mediation. (See Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation, ECF No. 10.) To encourage early resolution of litigation, thisCourt allows a defendant to ask for a stay of litigation so that the parties may participate in the Court's ADR Program. (lc) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause #13 .The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc) |
Filing 14 (STRICKEN PER 9/15/2022 MINUTES DOCKET NO. 17).ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Peter Manhon dba MMH Liquor store erroneously sued as MMH, LLC.(lc) Modified on 9/15/2022 (lc). |
Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalezto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Terminate Deadlines,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #12 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing No Later Than September 1, 2022 why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law laims, if any, and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (lc) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER REGARDING PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The Court finds that there is good cause to institute a limited scheduling order concerning basic case prosecution for cases under the Americans With Disabilities Act involving physical barriers in places of public accommodation. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC ENUMERATED REQUIREMENTS AND DEADLINES THEREIN). The failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a sanction of $300.00 payable to the clerk of the court within two weeks of Plaintiff being given notice of noncompliance and dismissal for lack of prosecution. The Court finds these sanctions sufficient and necessary to deter violations of the Order and to achieve timely prosecution of these cases without unnecessary intervention by the Court. (lc) |
Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) Modified on 8/18/2022 (lc). |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR MSJs. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) Modified on 8/18/2022 (lc). |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant MMH, LLC. (et) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Guri Gonzalez. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33818645 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Guri Gonzalez(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.