GS Holistic, LLC v. Chapman Smoke Tobacco, Inc. et al
| GS Holistic, LLC |
| Chapman Smoke Tobacco, Inc. d/b/a Chapman Smoke Tobacco, Ahd Ghanem, Nabil Hannalla and Chapman Smoke Tobacco, Inc. doing business as Chapman Smoke Tobacco |
| 2:2022cv05805 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC, upon Defendant Ahd Ghanem served on 8/27/2022, answer due 9/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ahd Ghanem with identity confirmed by subject saying yes when named. The individual accepted service with direct delivery. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC, upon Defendant Chapman Smoke Tobacco, Inc. served on 8/26/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alfy Felfel who indicated they were the person in charge with identity confirmed by subject stating their name. The individual accepted service with direct delivery. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Leon, Tomas) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pk)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Chapman Smoke Tobacco, Inc., Ahd Ghanem, Nabil Hannalla. (Attachments: #1 Summon Issued as to Ahd Ghanem, #2 Summon Issued as to Nabil Hannalla) (jp) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Remaining Summons, #2 Remaining Summons)(Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC, identifying Chris Folkerts, GS Holistic, LLC, Leon Law LLP, Tomas Carlos Leon, CHAPMAN SMOKE TOBACCO, INC. d/b/a CHAPMAN SMOKE TOBACCO, AHD GHANEM, and NABIL HANNALLA. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Leon, Tomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33821513 - Fee: $402, filed by Attorney for the Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC. (Attorney Tomas Carlos Leon added to party GS Holistic, LLC(pty:pla))(Leon, Tomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
